‘Human rights’ absurdities in Britain 3

The following is from a report and commentary you can read here.

 Iraqi Terrorist and former leader of the fanatic Mehdi army, Ahmed Al-Fartoosi, responsible for the deaths of dozens of British soldiers is suing the British Ministry of Defence —why?? – because someone left pornography near a toilet that Al-Fartoosi used.

How ironic that a man who apparently had no problems with killing dozens if not more people should scream like a baby over his "virgin" eyes looking at nude pictures is cause for a lawsuit.  But then again – did anyone force open Ahmeds eyes and make him look at the porn?? Obviously not. Thus if he looked at it – he did so voluntarily. Nevertheless, the mere presence of the likely magazine is enough for this brave muslim to put his hand out to receive compensation for his "discomfort".

The other "egregious" offences committed against Fartoosi for which he wants the British taxpayers to provide free legal aid so that he can in essence…………sue the British taxpayers are:

  • HEARING porn videos being played on a soldier’s laptop;

     

  • BUMPING his arm and thigh when being put in an armoured vehicle; and

     

  • LOSING sleep in his cell due to noise and lights from a corridor.

  • No formal complaints were ever logged regarding the above incidents leading one to surmise that the above "horrific events" were not upsetting UNTIL Fartoosi and Attorney Phil Shiner met.  Far too often, a dhimmi lawyer, such as Phil Shiner, is waiting in the wings and ready to dip his hands into the British taxpayers pockets so that, in this instance, he can also self-righteously pretend to protest a war that he says he disagrees with and also manage to greatly enrich his bank account in the process. (Shiner has a past history of profiting off of legal aid money to defend Iraqi insurgents.)

    Thus Fartoosi, via Shiner, is suing for false imprisonment and violations of new European human rights laws. Many feel that the EU human rights laws encourage terrorists to come to Britain. The EU human rights laws are consistently far more favorable to terrorists, murderers and rapists then to the victim so much so that a prominent British newspaper has started a movement to end the travesty that has been brought by these laws:

    "The whole concept of “human rights” in Britain has become a travesty under which the interests of killers, rapists and paedophiles are placed above those of their victims."

    Posted under Commentary by Jillian Becker on Monday, August 4, 2008

    Tagged with , , ,

    This post has 3 comments.

    Permalink
    • In my opinion we are right to be lenient to those who arent yet at our level. It proves that our values are higher. This man hasnt had our advantages, and the lawyer is only trying to help. Have a heart!

      Really? You want us to be lenient to those who want to murder and kill us? You want us to give people who behead apostates and stone adulterous women the same rights guaranteed to someone who has committed a much lesser crime?

      Doing so doesn’t prove that we have higher values, only that we are prepared to die by our own weakness.

    • Red Cherie

      In my opinion we are right to be lenient to those who arent yet at our level. It proves that our values are higher. This man hasnt had our advantages, and the lawyer is only trying to help. Have a heart!

    • Michael Cooper

      Outrageous.