Pre-emptive cringing 2

 David Limbaugh writes:

It’s ludicrous to entertain seriously the notion that if we’d just start being nicer, we could improve our international image and make ourselves safer, especially when you consider that being nicer entails lowering our guard and playing into the enemy’s hands on a number of fronts.

But this is precisely the kind of silliness that is driving Obama’s foreign policy. From the get-go, Obama has been apologizing to the world for the "arrogance" and brutality of the United States; bowing before, kissing and warmly accepting America-bashing books from foreign kings and dictators; flirting with nuclear disarmament while rogue nations rush, undeterred, to join the nuclear club; contemplating serious defense budget cuts across the board, which could jeopardize essential weapons systems; insisting that we cashier war terminology by substituting "overseas contingency operations" for "war on terror" and "man-caused disasters" for "terrorist attacks"; and now releasing internal CIA memos detailing enhanced interrogation techniques, which have demonstrably prevented attacks and saved lives.

Obama pretended to agonize over his decision to release the memos over the objections of his own intelligence officials, but there is no excuse for the damage it will do to our national security by neutralizing the future use of these procedures and inviting "the kind of institutional timidity and fear of recrimination that weakened our intelligence gathering in the past," in the words of former Attorney General Michael Mukasey and ex-CIA Director Michael Hayden. Making it worse, we got nothing in return except for Obama’s selective nod to "transparency," as if it’s prudent to be transparent with classified intelligence involving our national security.

It is axiomatic that ideas have consequences, a theme being played out by the Obama administration’s turning a blind eye to the magnitude of terrorist evil and seeing a rough moral equivalence between beheadings by terrorists and aggressive American interrogation techniques to extract lifesaving information from terrorists.

Commentators who believe Obama only released the "torture memos" to appease his bloodthirsty, Bush-hating, leftist base, which would be bad enough, are missing the point that  Obama shares his base’s beliefs. Obama is commander in chief, and his guiding foreign policy doctrine is "peace through weakness."

Posted under Commentary by Jillian Becker on Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Tagged with , ,

This post has 2 comments.

Permalink
  • Jillian Becker

    Hi Sabio.

    No, I can think of nothing he has done or said that I’ve praised or could praise. Best I can do: at least he let the SEALs shoot the pirates, and he has withdrawn from ‘Durban II’ – though ‘with regret’!

    Will I ever? His politics, policies, agenda, values, character, aims, affiliations, and oratorical style would have to change; he’d have to acquire knowledge of history and a grasp of world affairs and economics, develop the power of critical analysis, abandon his glibness and show himself capable of thinking, actively demonstrate that he holds freedom to be the highest value and the defense of America his first duty, and then I might find something to applaud. But as none of that is likely to happen – no I don’t expect I ever will.

    Do you like anything about him? If so, please tell us what and why.

  • I am very glad to see a non-Liberal Atheist site. But I have a question, on this site, have you ever said anything complimentary of Obama’s actions? Do you think you ever will?