Speaking of slavery … 2

In his Cairo speech, Obama painted a graphic picture of the sufferings of slaves, and went so far as to liken the plight of slaves in America in the past to the (self-inflicted) condition of the Palestinians in the present, implying that the Israelis are guilty of holding them in subjugation and inflicting extreme cruelty on them. A bigger lie, a more extreme libel is hardly possible. At the same time he does not choose to notice  that Arab Muslims are the world’s most persistent and unashamed slave owners. They keep, buy, sell and cruelly use slaves, most of them captured or bought in Africa.  

With fully justified righteous indignation, David Podvin writes in Canada Free Press:

Barack Obama’s speech in Cairo exemplified the craven liberal compulsion to appease evil. While progressives accuse conservatives who oppose affirmative action of being racist, Obama lavished praise upon his Muslim audience that enslaves millions of Africans. America’s first black president uttered nary a word on behalf of Islam’s many black captives. Liberals once opposed slavery rather aggressively [depends wh0 you mean by liberals – JB], but now ingratiate themselves to the slave masters.

Obama also abandoned gays to the predations of Muslim zealots. Although liberals have vilified Miss California USA for opposing gay marriage, Obama did not issue even the mildest rebuke to the Muslim world for perpetrating gay murder. When Mormons support traditional matrimony, progressives publicly explode in anger. When Palestinians commit homophobic homicide, the Left is unable to generate any discernible outrage.

The Obama speech failed to confront the barbarism of Islamic misogyny. Across the Koranic world, women are relentlessly abused. Islamic females are routinely flogged, sexually mutilated, and subjected to honor killings by their Muslim brethren. Yet Obama so yearned to avoid offending Muslim misogynists that his fleeting reference to Islamic women drew moral equivalence between their plight and the situation facing their American counterparts. Muslim females must deal with having their genitals disfigured while Western women must deal with the corporate glass ceiling. Obama equated these asymmetrical forms of bigotry, fecklessly declaring that all humanity must improve its treatment of women. His unwillingness to confront specifically the sadistic misogyny of Islam leaves imperiled Muslim women without the advocacy they so desperately need.

Obama forfeited a precious opportunity to champion the cause of the blacks and gays and women who are persecuted by Muslims. Theoretically, the welfare of these groups is of paramount importance to liberals. In reality, progressives concern themselves with the oppression of blacks and the slaughter of gays and the torment of women only when such injustices can be used to gain political advantage against Republicans…

Liberals not only refuse to condemn the racism and homophobia and misogyny being perpetrated by Muslims, they also smear as “Islamophobic” anyone who does object… Jihadists constantly commit atrocities while their liberal sycophants insist that Islam cannot be held responsible for the evil committed in its name… 

The liberal devotion to Islam constitutes history’s greatest unrequited love. Every social principle that progressives claim to cherish is rejected by the Muslim world:

Freedom of speech… Freedom of the press… Separation of Church and State… Civil rights…Women’s equality…

Liberals insist that these tenets are incomparably precious. Islamists could not disagree more. As Obama has proven again, progressives eagerly capitulate whenever protecting their cherished beliefs conflicts with the higher liberal principle of appeasing Islam.

Barack Obama’s speech was an amoral profile in cowardice. It therefore faithfully represented the modern liberal movement, which is extremely long on rhetoric, painfully short on backbone, and totally devoid of integrity.

Posted under Arab States, Commentary, Islam, Muslims by Jillian Becker on Saturday, June 6, 2009

Tagged with , ,

This post has 2 comments.

Permalink
  • Yes, chris, we really are conservative. We are for individual freedom, strong national defense, the rule of law with strict adherence to the Constitution and impartial judgment in the courts, small government, low taxes, the free market. We are against affirmative action.

    And we are against abortion but with certain sensible reservations such as: in cases where the pregnancy results from rape or incest; where the child is hopelessly physically or mentally impaired (and we don’t mean necessarily by Down syndrome), or would live in constant pain; where the mother’s life would be forfeit if a pregnancy continued. In such cases the termination should take place within the first 16 weeks of the pregnancy. We are appalled by the killing of babies born alive after abortion has been attempted, and by the use of abortion as a means of birth-control, as in Russia.

    Sorry we didn’t answer you about gay marriage. Our view is this: since there seems to have been a break-down of the traditional family (which we regret), and since more than a third of the children born in the US now are born out of wedlock, and since there is a clamor for gays to have ‘equal rights’, the question should not be: ‘Should gays be allowed to marry?’ but ‘Should marriage be abolished?’ – and replaced with a civil contract containing a clause that both (or all) contracting parties (irrespective of gender) must contribute adequately to the support of children, and also a clause allowing for termination of the contract. (We do not advocate interference with religious rites, but they would not substitute for the civil contract.)

    We are not able to help you get in touch with Buddhist pro-life conservatives.

    We do not agree with you that there is a common morality, if by that you mean that everyone agrees on what is right and what is wrong. (As you yourself say, Obama’s morality is to us immorality.) But I think you’re implying that there OUGHT to be common standards of morality – or shared values – and with that we can agree. We’d want those universal values to be our values – and adhered to.

    We thank you for your comments.

  • chris

    you really are conservative right? Just making sure. See Ide really like to get in touch with some atheist pro life conservatives . . . or at least find their websites. Ide also like to meet some budhist pro life conservatives. I hope its not to much to ask. I realize some atheists are not against gay marriage, which may be why you did not respond to my other comment. Seriously I am realizing there are diverse mixtures of ideas in people. If you could point me to them Ide be interested.

    As for my previous comment, I do believe there is a “common” morality. Obama biden laden does not show that morality. He is on the “common” immorality . . .