Can this be true? 5

From the Telegraph:

Creation, [a film] starring Paul Bettany, details Darwin’s “struggle between faith and reason” as he wrote On The Origin of Species. It depicts him as a man who loses faith in God following the death of his beloved 10-year-old daughter, Annie.

The film was chosen to open the Toronto Film Festival and has its British premiere on Sunday. It has been sold in almost every territory around the world, from Australia to Scandinavia.

However, US distributors have resolutely passed on a film which will prove hugely divisive in a country where, according to a Gallup poll conducted in February, only 39 per cent of Americans [according to whom?] believe in the theory of evolution

The film has sparked fierce debate on US Christian websites, with a typical comment [by whom? when? where?] dismissing evolution as “a silly theory with a serious lack of evidence to support it despite over a century of trying”.

Jeremy Thomas, the Oscar-winning producer of Creation, said he was astonished that such attitudes exist 150 years after On The Origin of Species was published.

“That’s what we’re up against. In 2009. It’s amazing,” he said. “The film has no distributor in America. It has got a deal everywhere else in the world but in the US, and it’s because of what the film is about. People have been saying this is the best film they’ve seen all year, yet nobody in the US has picked it up. It is unbelievable to us that this is still a really hot potato in America. There’s still a great belief that He made the world in six days. It’s quite difficult for we [sic] in the UK to imagine religion in America. We live in a country which is no longer so religious. But in the US, outside of New York and LA, religion rules.”

Does it? It’s hard for us in the US to believe that only 39% believe in evolution. And they almost entirely confined to New York and LA? What rare birds we country-bumpkin atheists are, if that is so!

But the writer of the article, Anita Singh, seems rather too vague, lacking attribution, to inspire much trust in her report. And it has the ring of a typical piece of European anti-Americanism.

Anyway, someone should seize this entrepeneurial opportunity and screen the movie. We suspect that millions will want to see it as much as we do, whatever they believe about evolution.

Posted under Christianity, News, Religion general, Science, United Kingdom, United States by Jillian Becker on Saturday, September 12, 2009

Tagged with , , , ,

This post has 5 comments.

Permalink
  • It's surprising that in yr 2009, so many Americans (a few of my friends in the US I know too) still believe in religious crap like Creation.

  • The original title of Darwin's book was On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. It's often abbreviated as The Origin of Species, but keeping the original On is hardly a sic-worthy error.

    • You are right, Wm Jas. I didn't search well enough for the original title. I shall remove that 'sic'. Thank you for the correction.

  • rogerinflorida

    A short while ago I was driving and listening to a talk radio show on which Ernest Istook was guest hosting. He said (seriously) that he firmly believes the world is only 8,000 years old, because that is what the bible says. Now to be fair, Ernest is generally regarded as a bit of a nut, but not apparently for his religous views.
    But then a commentator such as Ann Coulter has repeatedly said that evolution is a failed theory, a hoax, cannot be proved, etc. And she clerked at the Supreme Court! So it seems we have case of mass delusion in the US.

  • Xytan

    Yep, it's sad. Both my parents are religious nuts, and every time I mention Evolution they just roll their eyes and call me an idiot! They believe in a delusional myth about the creation of the Universe, and I'm the idiot? lol