What to do about Them 6

We quote from a column by Walter Williams at Townhall, which can be read in full here.

I believe that there’s little prospect for Arabs ever being free and that Western encouragement and hopes for democracy are doomed to failure and disappointment. Most nations in the Middle East do not share the philosophical foundations of the West. It’s not likely liberty-oriented values will ever emerge in cultures that have disdain for the rule of law and private property rights and that sanction barbaric practices such as the stoning of women for adultery, the severing of hands or beheading as a form of punishment, and imprisonment for criticizing or speaking ill of the government.

What should the West do about the gross violations of human rights so prevalent in North Africa, the Middle East and elsewhere? My short answer is to mind our own business. The only case in which we should interfere with Middle Eastern affairs is when our national defense or economic interests are directly threatened. That is, for example, if Iran were to meddle with Middle Eastern oil shipments or if we discovered good evidence of its building nuclear weapons, then we should militarily intervene. What they want to do to one another is none of our business.

We agree with him. Certainly the West should not be so culturally insensitive as to interfere with the Arabs’ colorful customs, such as oppressing and mutilating women, stoning adulterers, hanging homosexuals, amputating the limbs of thieves, routinely torturing prisoners, keeping and trafficking slaves, using children as living bombs and training them to saw people’s heads off.

But we shouldn’t hesitate to act when our national defense or economic interests are under threat. If an Arab tyrant blows up an American plane in flight, he should be punished. Arab states that train terrorists pose a threat to every nation, with the US top of their wish list, so they should be promptly discouraged by fleets of well-aimed drones. And as the West needs the oil that lies under Arab feet, the despots must not be allowed to price it at extortionist levels. (To prevent that, the oil fields of the Middle East should have been taken under American control decades ago.) The best policy would be to keep them in constant fear that America might strike them without warning at any moment. Only an occasional salutary demonstration of American wrath would be necessary. Bring back that old Shock-and-Awe. Judiciously but zealously inflicted, it could obviate the need for long and costly wars.

And the UN must be destroyed.

  • “the oil fields of the Middle East should have been taken under American control decades ago”

    I kind of like this idea.  We are currently in this “riding the fence” state of trying to be their friends while also being enemies.  Why not just do away with all that, and just accept that we are never going to be “real” friends?

    • Andrew M

      Psh, I doubt we even need their oil anyway. Let’s drill off the coast of our own country before we bother giving the petrol mullahs a big sloppy kiss of dhimmitude.

      But incompetents like BP may not purchase our oil fields anymore.

  • Liz

    I agree.  Will we ever again have leaders who can deal with these people realistically?  The way it’s being handled now reminds me of the guy who tried to live with the bears, and named them things like “Cupcake”.  Until they ate him.  It is such an unneccesary waste of time, effort, and the lives of our own people to pretend that they are civilized. 

    • “The way it’s being handled now reminds me of the guy who tried to live with the bears, and named them things like “Cupcake”. Until they ate him.”

      Liz, I love that analogy!!!

  • Frank

    You could have skipped all the verbage and just posted the last sentence.
    “The UN must be destroyed.”

    • George

      UN     means  [    Useless Neanderthals  ]