See no Islam, hear no Islam, speak no Islam 2

Here’s a video showing the absurd lengths this administration will go to in order to avoid associating acts of terrorism with the the word “Islam”.

Rep. Dan Lungren (R-CA) questions Paul Stockton, assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Security Affairs.

From the same article by Clare M. Lopez at American Thinker which we quoted yesterday in our post Protecting Islam from criticism, we learn why Paul Stockton has to dodge about so hilariously:

Capping the administration’s campaign to align U.S. national security policy within the parameters of Islamic law, the White House published “Strategic Implementation Plan for Empowering Local Partners to Prevent Violent Extremism in the United States” in December 2011. The plan makes clear that “violent extremism,” not Islamic terrorism, is the primary national security threat to the homeland. According to this “strategy,” the solution is partnership with “local communities” — the term used for the administration’s favored Muslim Brotherhood front groups, which already are using such relationships to silence their critics, both inside and outside government. These new rules of censorship state that the term “violent extremism” can no longer be used in combination with terms like “jihad,” “Islam,” “Islamist,” or “sharia.” And these new rules are already being taught to U.S. law enforcement, homeland security offices, and the military nationwide. 

  • Liz

    Its all becoming clear to me now – they must have declared war on us and murdered 3000 of us on our own soil because of all the mean things we said about them.  Silly me! Of course – that explains why we had to apologise to them, and now we have to prove that we mean it by passing laws that will allow them to punish us more every time we forget our manners and hurt their precious feelings again. How could we be so insensitive and uncaring?   

  • Rep. Lundgren even denied that we were “at war with Islam”, preferring the unnecessarily wordier “violent Islamist extremism”.

    This ignores the massively more threatening non-violent Islamist extremism that wants to subvert the American Constitution with a Sharia that protects Islam at all costs.