Lost at home 2

Our generation is witnessing the disintegration of the post-medieval world.

Until late in the twentieth century, the USA was a melting pot. The idea, which arose in the cities of ancient Greece, was that people from many origins would live together under law and not as ethnic groups, clans or tribes on ancestral land: “ius” not “rus” as it has been expressed. But no longer is that happening as it once did, not in the United States, not anywhere. “Multiculturalism” has replaced the melting pot.

Even as the State has grown over-powerful in the West, the nation it rules is dissolving – to a large extent because it has grown too powerful. Bureaucrats aspire to ever larger territories and populations to control.

Into their undefended territories swarm migrants from poorer lands – there to establish the very conditions that kept their own countries poor.

With the passing of the Western nation-state the vision of freedom under the rule of law, the ideal on which (among others)  the constitutional kingdom of Britain,  the Republic of France, and the Republic of the United States were founded, is passing too.

The Europeans do not know themselves. They (or enough of them to make the process irreversible) have cast themselves off  from their history, thrown aside their national identity, and helplessly capitulated to the primitive force of Islam, which has no doubts about itself.

Daniel Greenfield sees der Untergang des Abendlandes – the decline of the Westas we do. He writes at Canada Free Press:

In place of the melting pot is the No Go Zone, which is the inverse of integration, it sets up tribal encampments in major cities which run on the laws of the tribe. …

The United States has had its Fenian raids, its assorted wars being waged by immigrants from its soil, and the attitude toward those conflicts has been mixed, depending on whose ox was being gored. But there’s a fundamental shift when those wars are being waged against it. That shift from immigrants using it as a conflict base to becoming the target of their conflicts is a somewhat recent one whose full implications have still not been absorbed.

Across the southern border it faces mass immigration from a country whose history is riddled with old scores to settle and whose politicians use it as a whacking post for their national troubles. And to the east and the west it faces mass migration from the Muslim world, which is operating on its own form of manifest destiny, settling Europe and European colonies, the way that European colonists once settled America.

The news is no better in Canada or Australia, it’s certainly no better in Europe where the EU sees mass migration as a convenient way of completing its project of dissolving national identities. Encouraging separatism at the regional level is one way of doing it, but mass fragmentation of nations gets the job done even more thoroughly and comprehensively. …

If nations are meaningless, then national identities are equally meaningless. All that’s left are clans, religious and ethnic groups in the borderless multicultural globe. A chaos that sorts itself out through the old reliable means of brute force

Scots, Basques, Catalans, Bretons, Alsatians, Flems, Walloons ….

In a chaotic environment, tribalism and a compelling ideology can combine to carve out an expanding sphere of order. That is how Islam got its start, that is how it is operating now. In a fragmented environment, it has a leg up because it is organized and it has the money and vision to move forward, which is more than the natives or most of the other immigrants have.

To Islam, Europe, America and the rest of the non-Muslim world … are the Dar Al-Harb, the realm of the sword, where the faithful are destined to bring order. Every social problem proves how much the infidel world needs them to bring order, and the violence that they bring raises the stakes and drives everyone toward an inevitable conflict.

Good fences make good neighbors. Or they used to, quite often. At least they marked defensible areas. Now they’re coming down.

Borders are created to keep things out, like invading armies and suicide bombers. The border represents security and ownership, and when you take away the border those are gone and the soft vulnerable territories within are up for grabs to the ruthless and the canny. If the borders are down, then why not go north where there’s wealth and power up for grabs and take some for yourself.

National identity in the Muslim world is already weak, outmatched by religious identity on the one hand and tribal identity on the other. That set of conditions makes it quite difficult for them to build and maintain functional countries of their own, but leaves them quite well adapted to using tribal and religious ties to take over regions in a state of multicultural flux.

Islam is not built for competence, it’s built for conquest. Its effectiveness lies in its ability to create chaos, rather than maintain order. And every suicide bomber, every plot exposed, every riot over a cartoon demonstrates the power of that chaos and how far the local and global authorities who try to maintain order will go to appease the causers of chaos.

[The] West … has thrown away the survival skills necessary to cope with the situation and the survival skills it has are built on adapting to change by submitting to a new state of affairs, whether it’s a new set of ideas, a new set of forms or a new set of laws. … It no longer knows the answer to the question, “Who are we?”. …

Muslims … have an advantage because they understand their role better than the natives. … They are better adapted to the end of the state, because they have never truly internalized the reality of the state, than the Westerner for whom the state has become the fundamental unit of existence.

The Europeans cannot defend themselves. They have lost their countries without moving away from them. They are refugees in their own former homelands.

Westerners have become the ultimate refugees, lost at home, refugees in their own countries, wanderers in their own cities. … And the citizen of the first world often finds that he seems to belong less in his own country than the refugees flooding it. He has become a displaced person, a familiar enough feeling to many of his new neighbors who are also victims of ethnic and religious conflicts. But while the conflicts they have fled are official, his conflict is not. He is the victim of a nameless conflict that cannot be named, of a colonization that cannot be described as such and of the ethnic cleansing of his national identity and the theft of his future.

  • Liz

    Freedom under the rule of law – when you look at the history of the world preceding it, and also since it was established, it becomes clear just how fragile it is.  We have taken it for granted to the point that now we no longer recognize its significance. 
    It is appalling to see how the religious have become so ignorant and misinformed about history that they think “religious freedom” means a return to theocracy, since in their view, there is no real freedom without “salvation”, which requires their dictatorship.  They have literally sunk to the same level as the Muslims who for the most part have never known anything other than theocracy.  They have the same goal as Muslims of gaining dominion in government to pave the way for the “second coming”.
    The phrase “good fences make good neighbors” applies perfectly to the principle of separation of church and state.  Without a wall of  separation, we will end up in exactly the same state we fought to escape from with the monarchy and the Church of England.
     On the other hand, we have those on the left who believe that freedom must be subordinated to the cause of “social justice”, and “environmental justice”, and “food justice”, etc., etc….which of course requires THEIR dictatorship.
    It is amazing that we ever had anyone in charge of anything who was not convinced they needed to be Dictator for a cause.  

  • George

    The problem is that very few people are speaking up publicly and standing up for the soverignty of their advanced nations. Too many have “caved in ”  being  fearful of taking the leap of standing up for their freedom and future and that of their children , grand-children and future generations. I cannot say enough how much I appreciate the information we receive from this website and how it is indeed a breath of fresh air to get away from the liberal jargon we are “bombarded ” with perpetually.  However we MUST do more.  This in itself is not enough in the general sense. In addition to discussing issues and news events , we as a whole must speak out publicly as well and let our political leaders hear our disgruntled voices and let THEM know that we are angry regarding the actions they are taking , and about the destructive course that they are taking our society on.  Yes , it’s good to get things off our chests by exchanging viewpoints among one another but this alone is NOT going to change anything in society from a realistic and pragmatic position. What I am saying is true and factual but hard to face.  Like the old saying —— ”  All it takes for evil to prevail is for good men to do NOTHING ! ” .  The key word here is “DO”  , not just “TALK” .  We have a valuable news source here at The Atheist Conservative which has “armed” us with current news events information and also information that we are not receiving from the mainstream media because of PC censorship.  WE as a whole need to take this info and spread the word to as many as possible and encouraghe others to speak out and speak up and get involved.  If all we as atheists are going to do is sit around and talk  among  ourselves regarding these horrific events that are happing and nothing else then we  ( I hate to say ) are just as irrational and delusional as the theists that we criticize routinely.  If anyone feels that my comments are harsh , then so be it . It is not meant to offend but to inspire people to get out and get involved ( generally speaking ).  I call it the way I see it.  We don’t have time to just sit back and shrug our shoulders hoping that others will make it happen. It can only be us . Who will if we don’t ?