Muslim evil rising 6

The attacks on American legations in Egypt, Libya, and Yemen were not spontaneous outbursts of indignation over an America-made movie. They were tactical onslaughts in the continuing war Islam is waging against the United States.

Caroline Glick traces the anti-America plot to riot, burn, and murder:

On June 4 the White House confirmed that the US had killed Abu Yahya Al-Libi – Osama bin Laden’s Libyan lietenant who had moved into Al Qaeda’s #2 spot … after the Navy SEALs whacked OBL.

The top man being Ayman Zawahiri, an Egyptian doctor.

On Tuesday 9/11, a tape was released of Zawahiri announcing that Libi had been killed earlier this year by a US drone attack. … Zawahiri called for his terrorist underlings to avenge Libi’s death and especially exhorted Libyans to take revenge. 

The attack in Libya was well planned and executed. It wasn’t about a spontaneous protest against some ridiculous internet movie of Muhammad. The assailants came armed to the teeth, with among other things, RPG 7s. They knew that the US Ambassador was in Benghazi rather than Tripoli. They knew how to track his movements, and were able to strike against him after he and his colleagues left the consulate building and tried to flee in a car. …

Then there is the attack in Cairo. They were led by Mohammad Zawahiri – Ayman Zawahiri’s brother. …

Egypt’s US supported Muslim Brotherhood President Mohamed Morsi recently released [Mohammad] Zawahiri from Egyptian prison.

The same Barack Obama who has no time in his schedule to meet with Prime Minister Netanyahu next week in New York, is scheduled to meet Morsi.

The Egyptian government has not condemned the attack on the US Embassy in Cairo. But Morsi is demanding that the US government prosecute the film’s creator.

You may be wondering how some movie no one’s heard of has caused such a hullabaloo. Well, as it turns out, the film was screened on an Egyptian Salafist television channel. Obviously the Salafists – many of whom, like Zawahiri were released from prison by Morsi, wanted to stir up anti-US violence on the eve of 9/11. So if the film is responsible for the violence, a finger needs to be pointed to its chief distributor – Al Qaida’s Egyptian friends and members.

With these facts in hand, it is clear that the attempts to present these acts of war against the US as the consequence of some stupid nothing movie are obscene attempts to deflect the blame for these unwarranted attacks onto their victims and away from their perpetrators.

And what of that movie? Who made it?

The media report that it was made by “an Israeli Jew”.

So a Jew is to blame for the horrible exercise of free speech critical of Islam, that Obama and Hilary Clinton deplore more promptly, more instinctively than the attacks and murders.

But was it really made by a wicked Israeli Jew (if that isn’t a tautology)?

This is from Commentary by Alana Goodman:

When the story broke about an anti-Islam film that (supposedly) sparked the riots in Egypt and Libya, the AP initially reported that an “Israeli Jew” named Sam Bacile [an unJewish and altogether improbable name] was the producer, and that it was funded by Jewish donors. All day, the questions have swirled over who this mysterious Bacile character was, but many Israel-bashers ran with the claim that the producer holds Israeli citizenship. …

Actually, there’s no evidence that “Sam Bacile” even exists. The closest person who fits that description (at least electronically) is a self-proclaimed Egyptian “movie-maker” in California, who calls himself “Sam Bassel” on Facebook. Bassel has been registered on Facebook since 2010, and has posted regularly about the movies he supposedly produces, including the one that was used as a pretext for the Egyptian riots.

“Hello, I am a producer in a America and I live in Hollywood California,” he wrote in a July 15 post, well before the controversy erupted in Egypt. “I recently produced a movie that I believe to be one of the most historically important movie of our times. It is a 2 hour long movie about the entire life of the Prophet Muhammad from start to finish. Everything that is depicted in the movie is very true and well documented in all historical books that are found and taught in all Islamic countries.”

Bassel has posted about the film often over the past few months.

UPDATE: The Facebook page belonging to “Sam Bassel” was apparently taken down a few hours after I posted this, but PolicyMic published some screenshots.

Hold on, though, the story gets weirder. PolicyMic also flags an AP article that suggests Bacile/Bassel may actually be a man named Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, who claims to be a “manager” for the company that produced the film, as well as a Coptic Christian. Nakoula denied that he posed as Bacile, but the details dug up by the AP sure sound suspicious:

Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, 55, told The Associated Press in an interview outside Los Angeles that he was manager for the company that produced Innocence of Muslims, which mocked Muslims and the prophet Muhammad and may have caused inflamed mobs that attacked U.S. missions in Egypt and Libya. He provided the first details about a shadowy production group behind the film.

“Nakoula denied he directed the film and said he knew the self-described filmmaker, Sam Bacile. But the cellphone number that AP contacted Tuesday to reach the filmmaker who identified himself as Sam Bacile traced to the same address near Los Angeles where AP found Nakoula. Federal court papers said Nakoula’s aliases included Nicola Bacily, Erwin Salameh and others. …

“Nakoula denied he had posed as Bacile. During a conversation outside his home, he offered his driver’s license to show his identity but kept his thumb over his middle name, Basseley. Records checks by the AP subsequently found it and other connections to the Bacile persona.”

There must be a Jew behind it somewhere, though. [Note to the dense: We are being sarcastic. We are mocking anti-Semites.]

Trust the press agencies to keep looking for him.


Postscript, from Poynter:

A roundup of what has been reported about Innocence of Muslims, the anti-Islam film that contributed to attacks on U.S. embassies in Liby, Cairo, and now Yemen, killing US Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three staffers, [suggests that] it may not exist. A squadron of reporters has failed to locate evidence that anything longer than the film’s extremely weird “trailer” has been produced.

  • Yeah, its hard to see all this as coincidental. I really suspect that this is all tied in with the presidential election, and the movie stunt was part of a larger coodinated plan. One could imagine a lot of motivations and backers. Look, those guys all want it to go down. The difference is, Israel wants us involved, the arabs don’t… unless Obama was ready to go to the extreme of overtly backing the arabs against israel (a little too risky). If it really was Jews who put this together, they did it to provoke muslims who could be counted on to over-react and do something to enrage americans, thus building a little more will-to-war. This is the “convenient” narrative. The fly in that hypothesis is all the non-white house analysis saying this appears to have been a carefully coordinated attack/planned prior to the film release. one could imagine the film being made by ultra-conservative Jews, but coordinating with islamist on the embassy attack in Libya? That is why the white house is sticking to the lie that it was all spontaneous and related to the film. More likely is that Iran, and other islamic leaders are convinced that Israel will sooner or later bomb Iran and set off war in the middle east. They would much prefer sooner while O’bama is in still in office. He has at least four more months. Even if Romney gets elected, that gives them four months head start with an apeasement oriented president. A third possibility is that certain confederates of O’bama’s have calculated that if a war kicks off before the election, O’bama will then step in decisively and through a combination of brilliant diplomacy, and “menacingly” positioning air craft carrier’s nearby(which they always are anyways) Obama will appear firm, yet restrained, while the right will be seen as “hell bent” on getting us embroiled in another middle east war. This will be the “late September/or October” surprise. My bet is a collaboration between the last two

    • liz

      Judging from the phony financial crisis that suddenly loomed before the last presidential election, it was predictable that they would come up with something else for this one, and this seems to be it.
      They will stoop to anything – like starting World War 3 – for the sake of staying in power. Just when you thought they couldn’t sink any lower, a new depth is revealed!
      Meanwhile, their supporters are still feeling warm fuzzies over Michelles speech and how much he cares for them…

      • Don’t forget Bill Clintons speech. He hated O’bama’s guts. What persuaded him to deliver the sales pitch of a lifetime on O’bama’s behalf? Did George Soros offer him one BEEELION dollars? Or is it that he thinks the economy is likely to improve regardless of who is president(in spite of, in Obamas case), and vastly improve under Romney? He knows that if Romney is elected, Hillary will only have two chances of being elected in 2016… nil and none.

  • liz

    This is really interesting. When I watched that movie trailer it was so lame that, combined with how conveniently it was timed to come out, I began to wonder if it wasn’t just something the terrorists themselves made to use as an excuse for the attacks. This news seems to confirm that.
    All of this elaborate scheming and plotting going on, yet the Obama administration new absolutely nothing about it! So competent and on top of things! Yes, he’s doing an outstanding job – as a collaborator.

    • cheongyei

      Latest signs in Cairo:

      “We have 1.5 billion bin Ladens!”

  • cheongyei

    All of this because morons still believe in such nonsense as ‘prophets’.

    Insanity is rampant, and the jews and christians, as part of the abrahamic fold, are closer to the isslammists than to rational people. Revering prophets of any stripe is patently absurd. Revering one that was a wanna-be child-killer is wacked.