Atrocity is the law of Islam 3

Religion, say the religious, teaches moral behavior.

What was done to a little Saudi girl by her father, a Muslim imam, is so atrocious it is hard just to read about it.

From Creeping Sharia:

This imam doubted his 5-year old’s virginity [!] so he brutally raped, tortured and killed her! It’s unknown whom he suspected of taking the poor child’s virginity. …

Lamia al-Ghamdi was admitted to hospital on December 25, 2011 with multiple injuries, including a crushed skull, broken ribs and left arm, extensive bruising and burns… She died last October 22.

Fayhan al-Ghamdi, an Islamic preacher and regular guest on Muslim television networks, confessed to having used cables and a cane to inflict the injuries … They said the father had doubted Lamia’s virginity …

A social worker from the hospital where Lama was admitted, said the girl’s back was broken and that she had been raped “everywhere” her “rectum had been torn open and the abuser had attempted to burn it closed. One of her fingernails [was] removed, [and]the side of her head was smashed” …

What must be done to punish a man who commits such a crime? His religious law says – nothing much.

[According to] Islamic laws …  a father cannot be executed for murdering his children.  

The  imam father spent a short time in prison awaiting his trial. Then the judge ruled the prosecution could only seek blood money to be paid to the little girl’s mother, and that the time the defendant had served in prison “suffices as punishment”.

Imam Fayhan al-Ghamdi

  • David

    The essence and tone of moslem writings is that violence is necessary to maintain islamism. In this alternate universe, god loves his creation so much he is willing and does kill them. Reminds me of the laws of survival of the fittest, except read islamic traditionalist for fittest.

    • Jillian Becker

      Thanks for those observations, David. I have a video clip that bears out what you say about Muslims believing violence is necessary to maintain Islamism – or Islam itself, actually. I’ll post it soon.

  • liz

    Oh, yes, very moral behavior. Of course he wasn’t punished, because all of his “moral behavior” was “justified” by the infallible words of a holy prophet of a holy god, in a holy book. So of course THAT was entirely logical and justified!
    Torturing, burning, and murdering something as unimportant as a daughter is not a problem; if he had torched the book, he’d probably have been beheaded.
    But this is the religion that our own President praises as “advancing justice, progress, tolerance and the dignity of all human beings.”
    Isn’t that special?