Big Brotherhood 8

Further to our recent post Jon Stewart on NSA (December 15, 2013), in which we asked our readers if they thought NSA spying was justified if it kept us safe from terrorist attacks, here is a relevant article from Reason, by Jacob Sullum:

When US District Judge Richard Leon issued his preliminary injunction against the NSA’s phone record database yesterday, part of his  analysis … concerned whether the collection of telephone metadata counts as a “search” under the Fourth Amendment. But Leon also considered whether such a search might be “reasonable,” even without an individualized warrant, because of its usefulness in preventing terrorist attacks.

That part of the analysis was pretty straightforward, since the government had presented no evidence that the database has been useful in preventing terrorist attacks:

The Government does not cite a single instance in which analysis of the NSA’s bulk metadata collection actually stopped an imminent attack, or otherwise aided the Government in achieving any objective that was time-sensitive in nature. In fact, none of the three “recent episodes” cited by the Government that supposedly “illustrate the role that telephony metadata analysis can play in preventing and protecting against terrorist attack” involved any apparent urgency….

Given the limited record before me at this point in the litigation — most notably, the utter lack of evidence that a terrorist attack has ever been prevented because searching the NSA database was faster than other investigative tactics— I have serious doubts about the efficacy of the metadata collection program as a means of conducting time-sensitive investigations in cases involving imminent threats of terrorism.

Leon’s conclusion on this question is striking, since you’d think the Obama administration would be highly motivated to show that the database has been crucial in saving lives. If the government cannot muster a single plausible example, how can such a massive invasion of privacy possibly be justified?

The administration has been struggling with this problem since news reports based on leaks from former NSA contractor Edward Snowden first revealed the existence of the phone record database last June. At first intelligence officials and their allies in Congress suggested that the program had been instrumental in foiling more than 50 terrorist plots. But those claims — which were immediately questioned by Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Mark Udall (D-Colo.), who as members of the Senate Intelligence Committee ought to know — dissolved upon close examination. Last October a ProPublica analysis concluded “there’s no evidence that the oft-cited figure is accurate”.

The crucial question, usually dodged by the NSA and its defenders, is whether routinely collecting everyone’s phone records, as opposed to seeking specific, evidence-based court orders aimed at particular targets, has been decisive in stopping terrorist attacks. If the government has been unable to offer any examples in the last six months, it seems unlikely it ever will.

Well, it might. But more and more NSA resembles George Orwell’s “Big Brother” in 1984, with his observation of everyone all the time, in order to control their lives, their actions, and ultimately even their thoughts and emotions. He is the perfect symbol of the socialist state. If a conservative Republican Congress and president ever come to power again, they should abolish the agency’s listening and recording center. There are better ways to trace and track terrorists – among them, keeping watch on all mosques, and severely limiting Muslim immigration.

Posted under Commentary, government, Terrorism, tyranny, United States by Jillian Becker on Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Tagged with , , , , ,

This post has 8 comments.

  • The Civilizationalist


    Being a conservative, you might be interested in the evo-psych reasons why social conservative is the best way to organize human societies. Please see this link:

    • liz

      Great article – thanks for the link!
      Interesting that a recent ruling in Utah has made polygamy legal. Wonder if this regression has more to do with the appeasement of our “culturally enriching” Muslim invaders than with Mormons?

      • Jillian Becker

        Yes, it is a good article. But can traditional marriage be saved? It seems to be a withering institution, parodied by legalized gay marriage. Soon the weddings of persons to beasts and birds will be celebrated. And then ceremonies with one-sided vows of fidelity to rocks and rivers and trees…

        • liz

          Yes, I remember the woman who married a dolphin a few years ago. Wonder how that’s working out for her?

          • Jillian Becker

            And didn’t someone marry a carnival joyride of some sort?

            • liz

              I hadn’t heard about that one!
              The further down this road it goes, the more meaningless it gets.

  • liz

    It would be interesting to see what they HAVE been tracking with all that data. I’d be willing to bet that if anything, its the lives of conservative politicians and their donors, Tea Party groups, etc., while the real terrorists were ignored.
    Then of course there was the usual lie to cover their a**.
    Give them enough time and they’ll have Huma Abedeen in charge of the whole thing.

  • Frank