An atheist saved from religious persecution 3

For a change, some cheerful news from Britain:

This is from the Telegraph:

A young Afghan man who became an atheist after coming to Britain has been granted asylum on the grounds that the threat to his life for having no faith would amount to “religious” persecution.

In what is thought to be the first case of its kind in the UK, the Home Office accepted that sending the man back to his country of birth could put him in danger specifically because of his lack of religious beliefs.

The man, who is not being named for safety reasons, was born a Muslim but abandoned his faith after coming to the UK as a teenager around five years ago. …

In the latest case the man’s lawyers argued that as someone of no religious faith he could face even greater danger in Afghanistan than a member of a minority religion such as Christianity.

It comes just weeks after Supreme Court effectively recognised Scientology as a religion in a landmark judgment which established that it is not necessary to worship a god or gods to constitute a religion.

Of course atheism is not a religion; but if Britain is going to recognize that an ideology does not have to include a god to be a religion, then at last it may be accepted in some official quarters that Communism is a religion.

In the asylum case lawyers did not have to establish atheism as a “religion” because it was clear that any risk he faced would be of a religious nature.

But his solicitor, Sheona York, said it nonetheless underlined the significance of atheism as a distinct “philosophical position”.

The man’s case to the Home Office was prepared by Claire Splawn, a second year law student at the University of Kent, under the supervision of Ms York, through the Kent Law Clinic, a partnership between students, academics and solicitors and local lawyers.

She said: “We argued that an atheist should be entitled to protection from persecution on the grounds of their belief in the same way as a religious person is protected. … We believe that this is the first time that a person has been granted asylum in this country on the basis of their atheism. The decision represents an important recognition that a lack of religious belief is in itself a thoughtful and seriously-held philosophical position.”

In the submission they explained that having lived in Britain for several years and adopted western customs and dress, the young man feared that even were he to disguise his atheism in Afghanistan it would quickly be discovered.

It says that the application was made on the basis that: “As an atheist, if returned to Afghanistan, he will face persecution for a Convention reason, namely (lack of) religion; or alternatively that he faces a substantial risk of serious harm on account of his lack of religious belief. … Afghanistan is a Muslim dominated country where religion underpins every aspect of everyday life. Furthermore, in Afghanistan, and even in Kabul, life is lived in such a way that everyone is connected with everyone else. There is no sense of privacy and his lack of beliefs would become very quickly known. It is clear hat the applicant fears for his life in Afghanistan where he is not only non-Muslim but does not in fact believe in any religion.”

It goes on to explain how the man had recently made a visit to another predominantly Muslim country, to visit friends, and had been “shocked” by how his lack of belief made him stand out.

“He was shocked by how everyone talked as if life meant nothing to them,” it says.

“People said ‘this is not the only world’ and that you have to believe. People said ‘you cannot sit and eat with people who are not Muslim’.

“He noticed that to the people he met, this life meant nothing to them and all their expectations were focused on the other world, life after death.”

  • liz

    In the last aspect mentioned, (as in many others), that their focus is on life after death only, they share the same mentality as many Christians.
    What a wasted life. But they take it further by wasting everyone else’s life along with their own, by forcing their “believe or die” credo on them.
    This case of the young man becoming an atheist should be the natural progression for all of them. Yet even some born here, or who received college educations, still willingly enslave heir minds to this barbaric insanity.
    They need to be confined to their original countries for a few hundred more years of cultural evolution before we have any dealings with them at all.


      Most of the people who believe in this faulty emotional premise never unbiasedly test their premise against the reality of hard facts and reason, or they make a living from preaching to the “faithful.”

      Others are either afraid of the outcome of such a test, or afraid of angering an unseen “God,” or actually never realize what great freedom that perceptive reality and self-reliance bring to their life’s questions.

      For myself, it was the convenience of always ‘I’m too busy to investigate my belief systems!” After some prodding by a great teacher in my life, I finally took the personal “challenge.”

      I would think that most folks would want to live a much more authentic life, devoid of as much superstition as possible.

      But then I remember my reasons for not looking deeper than a popular belief.

      Fear is a great motivator, or in this case, a great reason to believe in superstition.

      • liz

        Yes, when you’re taught that your reason is defective and distorted by your sinful nature, it’s easy to just ignore anything reason might teach you. Rationalism becomes as suspect as witchcraft, and therefore to be studiously avoided!