Obama’s racist immigration policy 17

Obama warned that he would “fundamentally change America”.

From what to what wasn’t asked or stated.

He is plainly making a demographic change. That is as fundamental a change as any change could be.

Fundamentally the nation has been from its inception an Anglophone country, its law based on British common law, it’s values – enshrined in the Constitution – derived from the European Enlightenment. Immigrants were invited into the land from everywhere and anywhere in the world, and were expected to use English, obey the law, and uphold the Constitution.

Obama wants to change all that. He manifestly does not want America to be solely or even predominantly English-speaking; he does not believe the law is sovereign, preferring it to be what leftist judges say it is from one moment to another, in accordance with their moods and personal prejudices; and he wants to scrap the Constitution.

Therefore he does not want new immigrants from Britain or Europe, or any Anglophone countries. Which is to say, he does not want white immigrants.

He wants enormous numbers from the Third World, where the Enlightenment never penetrated, and rule by tyrants and criminals is customary. So he invites hundreds of thousands of immigrants – millions over time –  from the Muslim Middle East, Latin America, and countries where most people are black. 

It is a policy of downright racism.

Obama is a racist.

This is from the MailOnline:

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services [USCIC] plans to seek a vendor to produce as many as 34 million blank work permits and “green cards” – the paperwork that authorizes illegal immigrants to live and work in the United States – as the White House prepares to issue an executive order after the Nov. 4 midterm elections.

According to a draft solicitation published online, the government agency will look for a company that can produce a minimum 4 million cards per year for five years, and 9 million in the early stages.

President Barack Obama has pledged that he will make a move on immigration reform this year. His original timetable called for a decision by the end of the summer.

Republicans have decried the plan as an “amnesty” for millions of illegal immigrants, including hundreds of thousands of unaccompanied minors who have come across the U.S.-Mexico border this year. …

Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which he ultimately enacted without congressional support, uses the EAD cards [Employment Authorization Documents] as part of its implementation.

USCIS says it processed 862,000 EADs overall between January and June of this year.

But “the guaranteed minimum for each ordering period is 4,000,000 cards”, according to the draft RFP (Request For Proposal].

“The estimated maximum for the entire contract is 34,000,000 cards.”

But why even bother with the documents?

This is from the Washington Times:

The ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee took the Obama administration to task Friday for its “irresponsible” plan to allow as many as 100,000 Haitians to immigrate to the U.S. without a visa.

Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa said the administration’s Haitian Family Reunification Parole Program — which will allow thousands of Haitians awaiting a U.S. visa to enter the country and legally apply for work permits — is “an irresponsible overreach of the executive branch’s authority”.

The Obama administration is unabashed.

“The rebuilding and development of a safe and economically strong Haiti is a priority for the United States. The Haitian Family Reunification Parole program promotes a fundamental underlying goal of our immigration system — family reunification,” said Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas. “It also supports broader U.S. goals for Haiti’s reconstruction and development by providing the opportunity for certain eligible Haitians to safely and legally [sic] immigrate sooner [in]to the United States.”

There’s typical Obama gang “reasoning” for you: rebuild Haiti by taking large numbers of Haitians out of it.

They are highly desirable immigrants to Obama, because they are black.

  • liz

    Yes, because they are black, and because they will overwhelm the system, and most likely vote for Democrat criminals who promise handouts.
    Since any criticism of Obama is considered racist, anyway, why not criticize him for being a racist, too? A lying, America hating, commie racist.

  • Dale Jensen

    You need to make up your mind Jillian. Do you think race is central to the survival of a civilization or don’t you? If race doesn’t matter then why do you care if Haitians or Arabs or African Blacks or Mexicans come to America? Because they weren’t exposed to the Enlightenment? After how many centuries can that still be used as an excuse? You mean there is nothing in their biology which bothers you just that they haven’t read Locke and Montesquieu and Newton and Voltaire, etc. One could argue they would need at least an extra 20 points of average IQ for those writers to be even comprehensible.

    This is the thing about all of today’s conservatives. You see the damage which is occurring because of multiracialism but you are terrified of being explicitly pro-white. Why? Would that make you a Nazi in your minds? Hitler really should burn in hell. But because the consequence of his failure was that Whites have become suicidally weak and apologetic out of guilt. Post 3rd Reich Whites can no longer feel proud of their race and want to preserve it. But every other race can. This is what is so tragic.

    This site has good instincts. But as soon as your “pro-individualism” ideology kicks in you go back to being suicidal.

    • To hold the values of the Enlightenment – chiefly, to hold freedom. reason, justice highest of all – is to be civilized, no matter what the color of the person’s skin, or his ethnic descent, who holds them. And you don’t have to read Voltaire etc to hold them – they permeate our Western civilization, they are enshrined in the US Constitution. Western European languages are soaked with them – especially the English language. I am forever an individualist because no generalizations that can be made, however apt as generalizations, about any large group into which people are born can possibly be applied with any certainty to any individual. America was a melting-pot, and should continue to be a melting-pot. I do not think race is “central to the survival of civilization”. I think the rule of law, Enlightenment values, good education, freedom are central to the survival of civilization. It would be fine for Guatamalans, Syrians, Haitians to come and live in America, IF they accept that, and teach it to their children. Hitler and Stalin and the Grand Inquisitors and Calvin were not exceptions to the white race – they were evil white men who gained total power. You want to exclude them from the generalizations you make about whites? On what grounds? Was their “biology” – a factor supremely important to you – different from the biology of Voltaire? Let’s get personal. I’d far rather have a Thomas Sowell as president than a Jimmy Carter. I’d very much LIKE to have someone who can think like Thomas Sowell to be president! You are propounding racism, Dale Jensen. It is an irrational creed which is as bad for the human race as any other irrational creed. Great cruelties have been perpetrated in its name. The very fact that you – no doubt a white person – hold such views proves that the white race as such has no claim to superiority. As an individual, you – in my opinion – are demonstrating an inferiority at the vital business of thinking, and also a lack of humanity and goodwill.


        It it this administration’s present policy to reward the inept deadbeats on the system and also allow the illegal alien free access to not only our country, but it’s system of welfare.

        Those receiving these rewards pay no real price for them. This fact causes these gifts to devalue in light of how common they’ve become.

        Devaluation of standards through patronizing folks with gifts (with the administration’s intentions of supporting their cause) is a very bad plan, and ultimately a killer for any civilization to adopt.

        A country’s immigration policy is it’s first line of defense…a defense of it’s way of life and it’s freedom.

        This President’s policy has been to override anything in our Constitution that stands against his personal policies, especially immigration.

        If we do not regain control of our borders, and government in general, nothing else will matter much.

        • liz

          Right – rather than the way it is now, with the government controlling US. They are creating the crises, as a means to that end.

      • liz

        Well said!

      • Dale Jensen

        America was NOT a melting pot. It was founded by Northern Europeans. It was the product of the genetics of European man. And so what that Europe has had mass murderers. Every race has. But Europeans did something only the North-East Asians have done, they developed anadvanced civilization because they have the civilization building gene. They also produced enough individuals with an IQ over 106 (key number) and a K-selected (largely) sexual mating pattern (not R-selected like blacks) Euros are also high enough in testosterone levels that allow them to take risks (to a greater extent than Asians do) but don’t lower their IQ (as with blacks). In other words, whites have built civilization because it is in there genes to do so. That they committed atrocities along with their great achievements means nothing. European civilization is the product of the selection pressures that the Nordics survived through. Their civilization can not be expanded to include others that don’t have the same capacities at the population level. We are seeing that play out daily.

        To think that all people have this ability just because they were born is blank slate absurdity. Also, you have never studied history in any depth. Time and time again, civilization fall when the racial stock of the nation changes from the people who built that nation. This is really why Rome fell. It was saturated with mixed race citizens that out numbered the original Nordics. This is happening with America again. Whites will eventually be minorities in their original countries. We’ll see what compassion the mixed races and non-whites will treat whites with then. I would not be surprised if the next Holocaust was directed at white people. And all because of a combination of Leftists (radical egalitarians) and libertarians (or radical “Individualists”) thought moral virtue consisted in surrendering their country to non-whites because “everyone is an individual”.

        And the real kicker is that you call yourself a conservative. You are a radical race-blind libertarian. In any other time in history you would be considered delusional. Sadly this just proves that there is no “right wing” in this country. There is just left-liberals and right liberals (libertarians plus mainstream conservatives). Larry Auster was right, America has no opposition to Leftism. I could cry.

        • “The original Nordics” of Rome? And you say I haven’t studied history “in depth”?

          What gave the Anglo-Saxons the edge in modern times were certain ideas. Those ideas have a long history. Their beginnings are traceable to the ancient Greeks, who were the first to make scientific experiments, to explore the universe scientifically. Philosophical ideas reached the Hellenes from all over Alexander’s great empire. They all helped to ignite the light of classical civilization, which was all but snuffed out entirely by Christianity. But eventually the flame revived with the Renaissance dawn and the Enlightenment daylight. Some of the best ideas were borne across the sea to America, and inspired the Founding Fathers. Since they founded the United States of America, many persons from many places who came to enjoy and work in the free new world have contributed to the prosperity and success of this America. If you were to subtract from our present world all the ideas that came from what you regard as inferior races, it would be very much poorer and far less of a success.

          You could brood on that instead of telling us what we think and into which of your categories we fit. If you think a racist analysis of history is the only answer to leftism, you ought to cry.

          • REALBEING

            I don’t think that anyone could’ve put this treatise down in print any better than this! Great thoughts!!

    • Don L

      Across time and around the world…any system of governance predicated on the notion that government can take, by force, the products of an individual’s mind and sweat and give it to others has failed or is in the process of failing. You seem to be arguing for such an absurd impossibility: let everyone come because the U.S. government will take care of them; by ‘redistributing” from those that produce. (by the way, the government is 545 office holders. We the people are not the government, we are the governed and we are waking up!)

      Do we not have the right to make sure those that show up here can take care of themselves and are disease free? That seems to be lacking in your presentation but it is implied that we don’t.

      Haiti, and other backward nations, continue to fail because leftist/progressive keep exporting their central planning based schemes…including disregard of unalienable rights. Mexicans are to cowardly to fix their own country so they escape here.

      All but westernized/enlightened peoples are induced and seduced to come to America NOT because of a caring nation, but rather because of the DON’T CARE politics of permanent votes for permanence in power by 545 politicians and justices and their cadre of stooges. Socialism doesn’t care about race or people in general. It kills and uses whomever. And, social justice….what baloney. It’s about the power intelligentsia attaining and maintaining privilege…they know what’s best for all; after all.

      My first thought upon reading your comment seemed to have some personal element…too familiar…a personal attack on Jillian. ???

      Regardless, your arguments are empty and distorted. I’m curious (rhetorical) what is your view of the world since pro-individualism is so unappetizing for you? I’d wager you don’t believe in the right to private property, do you (again rhetorical)?

      Incidentally, after some 600 years of study, it has been shown, time-after-time to be absolutely true that only free people dealing in free markets offers the highest and best opportunities for each and every individual (irrespective of race or gender) and for the protection and “sustainability’ of rare physical, fiscal and intellectual resources. Of course, this truth is not taught in progressive-oriented compulsory schooling systems. Only central planning-based economics are taught…Say, how best to keep in power….bring in more uneducated and ignorant masses use to government domination…they don’t ever question the government. Heil commissar Jensen!


        Simple statement………..ANY uncontrolled, illegal incursion into this country will allow any, and all types of infectious diseases in, along with the carriers of said diseases.

        And these carriers may, or may not be of the terrorist brand…….

        Enterovirus 68, anyone???

        • Don L

          Absolutely. Nobama’s bunch never told where they shipped all those kiddies that skipped their way into the USA.

          If I think it…they have: little kiddies loaded with all manner of disease heading to our loving-arms southern border. Like Brits and blankets to the Mohicans.

      • Dale Jensen

        Are you actually stupid enough to be calling me a socialist? I’m an alt-right winger. My point is Larry Auster’s point. That if you want your peaceful, prosperous “liberty-oriented” society then race matters. Biology matters. America is the product of the
        European people. You replace them with non-Europeans and America dies. Or transforms to something non-Western, non-European.

        This site is essentially a libertarian site. I don’t know why you keep calling yourselves conservatives. Libertarians at best can operate only amongst whites. If you’re going to be a libertarian, then paleo-libertarianism is about the only viable option; ie a free market pan-European society. I have my doubts even about that.

        Jillian talks about Obama’s racist European immigration policy. But what does she expect?. The Left is explicitly anti-white. The alt-right view is that to defend the historic American society you need to be pro-white. Being “pro-liberty” is delusional right liberal utopianism. Sadly just what the Founding Fathers were. The foundation of a nation is its racial stock; its ultimate “cultural capital”. This doesn’t imply Nazism. Are the Japanese Nazis because Japan is 99% Japanese? Would Japan be Japan if it had our racial make-up; 13% black, 17% hispanic (and growing), etc? No their entire society would be disrupted and their quality of life would plummet. Just like ours has.

        The free-market is not an irreducible primary. It does not replace race and social cohesion as the fundamental building blocks of a society. I am not a right-socialist. Free market economies are fine. But they must operate in a society which is held tightly together through shared genetic similarity (ie race), shared common tradition, shared value structure and shared family patterns. Letting in non-Euros disrupts all that especially when you let in low IQ immigrants or Muslims. Although even allowing high IQ Asians is disruptive.

        Strong nations need Strong fences.

        • Don L

          You’re an imbecile. Not only are you a socialist you’re an extreme NAZI…national socialist. But, you’re too ignorant of economics to understand you define a fascistic political economy centered around race. In any event, you are not worth any further response..

          • REALBEING

            Jahvol! Ve ist ze Mahster RRRRaccee!!!

            • Don L

              Danke mein grupenfuhererreerrr!!

        • REALBEING

          “America is the product of the
          European people.”

          UHHHH…….no. America is the product of her different, and various peoples, no matter from whence they came. Here, they found the freedom to expand on their many different ideas.

          Depending on the person, and their attachment to their old country, they may retain a certain old-country “glow.”

          But once they take the oath, they are Americans…Skin color, shape, size, and any other ‘pigeon hole’ folks like you want to place them in dissolve, in the light put forth by our Constitution, sir.

          Personal beliefs and actions are relegated to being strictly personal, as long as they do not infringe upon another’s right to believe, or take part in their own personal exploits.