Psst! he’s a M-sl-m 4

First, Creeping Sharia reports what the Daily Mail reported:

This is the heavily-armed suspected terrorist with ties to radical Islam who was overpowered by passengers on a train from Amsterdam to Paris.


Ayoub El-Khazzani, 26, is being quizzed by French counter-terrorism police after he allegedly opened fire on the high-speed train with a Kalashnikov.

The Morocco-born suspect reportedly wounded one man before he was disarmed and beaten unconscious by two American soldiers and a student.

Alarmingly, he had already been on government officials’ radars in four European countries before he carried out Friday evening’s terror attack.

He had been deemed a terrorist threat following the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris – and had apparently fought with ISIS in Syria earlier this year.

Questions are now being asked as to how El-Khazzani was able to move freely around Europe, despite being widely known as ‘potentially dangerous’.

French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said on Saturday that Spanish authorities had flagged the jihadi to French officials last February because he belongs to the ‘radical Islamist movement’ – something El-Khazzani appeared to support on his Facebook page, which has since been deleted.

El-Khazzani, who was reportedly radicalized while living in Spain, was subsequently placed on an intelligence watch list in France.

He was identified as a terrorist threat in January after terrorists stormed the offices of Charlie Hebdo and shot dead 12 people, it is reported.

On Saturday, officials confirmed through fingerprints their suspicions that the Thalys train terrorist was the same man who had been on their radar.

Although Cazeneuve did not give a name, a source familiar with the case named the shooter as El-Khazzani, Reuters reports. The source said he was believed to have flown from Berlin to Istanbul on May 10 this year. Turkey is a preferred flight destination for would-be jihadists heading for Syria.

El-Khazzani is thought to have received military training with ISIS there, before traveling to Syria to fight with the terror group, The Telegraph reports

The suspect had left France in 2014, before traveling to Syria and returning to France to assemble a horde of deadly weapons, it is said.

In Spain, he lived in Madrid between 2007 and 2010 before moving to the southern port of Algeciras.

He was arrested in Spain at least once for a drug-related offence, the Spanish counter-terrorism source said.

Cazeneuve said the man had also lived in Belgium and that inquiries ‘should establish precisely the activities and travels of this terrorist’.

French newspaper Le Voix du Nord reported that the jihadi may have had connections to a group involved in a suspected Islamist shooting in Belgium in January. The Belgian government confirmed an inquiry into the shooting is under way, but would not comment further on any potential link.

In total, El-Khazzani had been identified as a terrorist threat by Spanish, French, German and Belgium intelligence services, it is reported.

However, it is unclear whether he was placed under surveillance in any of the countries.

The motive behind Friday’s attack also remains unclear.

Next, Creeping Sharia corrects the Daily Mail:

The only thing that remains unclear to the majority of logically thinking humans is how any of these people – including the media who regurgitate this nonsense – still have jobs.

His motive was jihad, for Islam and Allah, to establish a caliphate ruled by sharia.

It was originally reported that the heroes were U.S. Marines, apparently they were:

[US] Air Force airman Spencer Stone ran at the gunman, along with Oregon National Guard member Alek Skarlatos.

With the help of Anthony Sadler, from California, and British national Chris Norman, they stopped the terror attack.

When even the Daily Mail, a newspaper that has a well-deserved reputation for full and accurate reporting, will not NAME THE ENEMY, what chance do we have of defeating him?

Why the reluctance to say “Muslim”?  Because anyone who does will be labelled a “racist” by the politically correct, aka the Left.

Why didn’t the police, and other authorities whose job it was to prevent and punish crimes against children, act to save the thousands of young girls who were “groomed” for prostitution by  MUSLIMS in Rotherham and other English cities? Why? Because they feared being called “racist”!

If the European countries arrested all the jihadis their intelligence agencies have identified, the funny thing is they would all be MUSLIMS, and so governments with police forces and military strength and the armament of the law, fear they’d be called “racist”!

This state of affairs is not only ridiculous, it is suicidal.

Leaving aside the fact that Islam is not a race, and accepting that the word “racism” has lost its meaning and is now only a “boo” word, we point out that the world has come to fear it as the worst of all possible accusations. “Murderer”, “rapist”, “torturer”, “kidnapper”, “blackmailer”? Not nearly as bad. “Nazi”? Even that, not as bad. “Communist?” Oh, a positive compliment! But “racist”? No, no! Better to die – or let any number of other people die.

Real racism – individuals discriminated against by law on grounds of race – is evil. And the mistreatment of individuals on grounds of race in society generally is nasty. But is it nastier than the forced prostitution of children? Nastier than a massacre in a train?

If the answer by most people to those questions is now “yes”, then it is time for brave men and women to dare to let themselves be called racists.

  • Bruce

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: intelligent, sane people should be concerned about being called a racist by the lackwitted left about as much as a Jew should concern themselves with Hitler’s personal opinion of them. It simply does not matter what those disconnected with reality think. Especially when you’re dealing with those who are nothing but a bunch of apologists for murderers and rapists.

    • Bruce, I don’t quite get your point. Are you saying it shouldn’t matter to one what despicable people call one? If so, I agree in principle, in day to day living, though it is hard to ignore being abused and insulted. What I’m saying is that people called “racist” should no longer take it as an insult unless it is obviously apt. A university official, for instance, treating someone differently from others because of his race – eg. keeping some Asians out because “too many of them” score high SAT results – is truly acting as a racist, and the word would be apt applied to him or her, and should still carry opprobrium. The same when someone writes a comment on our pages saying that whites are superior to blacks – or vice versa . But when the word is used as it is now by the Left simply to mean “I hate you”, it should be ignored. Or when a white police officer arrests a black criminal and the word “racist” is flung at him, it should be ignored. Or when we criticize Obama for making America poorer and weaker, and the word “racist” is hurled at us, we should ignore it.

      Just one thing though – not to argue, only to clarify. Hitler’s personal opinion of the Jews resulted in the deaths of 6 milliion of them. If more Jews had let his statements in Mein Kampf and in his speeches be of concern to them – if more had believed what he said – more would have escaped his attempted genocide. Perhaps that is what you meant by your first sentence? But then your last two sentences seem to indicate a different point – the one I ask about in my paragraph above.

      • Bruce

        You’ve got my train of thought pretty much correct. When dealing with members of the far left, unless you completely and utterly cave-in to their beliefs and demands, they tend to be happy to call you every foul name in the book, and consider you the source of all evil. Truth and nuance do not matter to them, only the pushing through of their agenda. As for the Hitler bit, I mean that to a Leftist, anyone not of their group who stands up to them is the enemy; they are to be destroyed by any means and with any words (no matter how untrue) necessary, just as the Jews were served by the Nazis. Thus, the personal opinion of a leftist regarding the character of a conservative is, in general, not worth honestly considering because it is not based on reason and facts, but on advancement of an agenda.

  • liz

    Yes, the word “racism” has lost all meaning, since the left has appropriated it to serve its purpose of annihilating all opposition to any part of its agenda.
    So who should care if they are labeled with a meaningless word? It’s such a joke now, people should laugh at the idiots who attempt to intimidate them with it. Only the idiots are in charge now, and people lose their jobs and their reputations over it.
    Bravo to the American (and British) men who weren’t afraid to attack the MUSLIM terrorist! Didn’t worry who might be offended by THEIR “racist” “islamophobia”, did they?