The sun warms the earth! 6

An expert in applied mathematics has found a flaw in “the basic climate model which underpins all climate science”.

Here’s the report by Karl Denninger:

A mathematical discovery by Perth-based electrical engineer Dr David Evans may change everything about the climate debate, on the eve of the UN climate change conference in Paris next month.

A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.

He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.

He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.

It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says. …

When the IPCC models are re-run with this clear error repaired the lack of correlation with the prediction and actual results disappears.

So, the new improved climate model shows CO2 is not the culprit in recent global warming. But what is?

Dr Evans has a theory: solar activity. What he calls “albedo modulation”, the waxing and waning of reflected radiation from the Sun, is the likely cause of global warming.

Yes … global temperatures had a very high correlation with observed solar activity which we have a very good record of going back hundreds of years because it was very easy to observe without modern scientific equipment. … They correlate, with a fairly deterministic (that is, fixed) lag time, to global temperatures.

CO2 does not, which means you need to postulate a model that does not square with what we know about the physical properties of carbon dioxide.

Will this finding make any delegates to the Paris gathering of hell’s minions change their opinion that human-generated CO2 is the cause of “global warming”?

It should do, but the “climate change” fanatics are very unlikely to take notice of it. They want to use an absurd threat – that the earth will become too hot to live on if we don’t stop doing what we like and do exactly as they tell us – to destroy market economies, individual freedom, and the autonomous nation state. And establish world Communist government.  

Truth has no place in the future they plan for the sad remnant of the human race that might survive their colossal shipwreck of civilization.

(Hat-tip to our highly valued commenter, liz)

Posted under Climate, Environmentalism by Jillian Becker on Friday, October 9, 2015

Tagged with , ,

This post has 6 comments.

  • Robbie

    So in that case instead of making CO2 the boogeyman and destroying the global economy with enormous taxes on fossil fuels, we could actually be solving the problem by building orbital shades to block some of the sunlight and cool the Earth.

    • Seems there is no global warming. Not for the last 18 years, anyway. Climates always change, all over the earth. Always have, always will. No way – fortunately – to block off the sun. except from your own body of course.

    • Bruce

      Actually I’d not mind us trying to build orbital solar collector fields or the like. Considering the incredible technological dividends produced by space technology development during the Apollo program, it might actually be worth it on a ROI basis. Not to mention that much of it would also be applicable to a Mars mission, which could cut development time and costs on that project as well.

  • liz

    Thanks for posting this – it just makes my day and decade!
    First of all that it proves us “deniers” right, and leaves the oh-so-superior “it’s settled science” crowd standing butt naked, their “science”, and superiority, an illusion. HA!!
    It would be great to watch the entire house of cards collapse now, but they have too much invested in it as a takeover strategy to admit it’s truth.

    • Bruce

      The left will ignore it. Nothing to see here. Please continue to give our green industry cronies massive contracts so they can kick cash back to our election campaigns. Nothing to see there either.

      • liz

        Exactly. They’re experts at ignoring facts. Easy to do when the media conveniently omits them for you.