A finger in the dyke 8

Geert Wilders is a brave fighter against the Islamization of his country, Holland – and of Europe and the West in general.

He would stop the floods of Third World, overwhelmingly Muslim, immigrants pouring into Europe. They bring with them their barbarous customs, an ideology of conquest and subjugation, violence and disease. They become instantly dependent on welfare provided out of the taxes of the indigenous Europeans;  and at the same time they declare their intention of subverting the political system and rule of law under which their hosts live, and instituting their authoritarianism and cruel sharia law instead.

It should be intolerable to all Europeans. But so many of them have been brain-washed by leftism since the 1960s to believe that they owe the peoples of the Third World recompense for having colonized their countries, that they are bowing like the Christians they are, to the avengers of their self-confessed sins. (However little they consciously adhere to their ancestral religion, their moral culture was marinaded in it for a long dark age, and its self-abasing dogma still apparently feels right to them.)

In fact, European colonization brought huge benefits to the Third World. The Third World is in debt to the First World, not the other way about.

Will enough Europeans support Geert Wilders’s effort to hold back the flood? As help came to the little Dutch boy who tried to stop the sea breaking through the dyke by putting his finger into the hole?

He seems to think that help is on its way. He  writes at Canada Free press:

We are witnessing America’s struggle to be America, and the struggle of several European nations, among them the Netherlands, Britain, France, Germany and many others to preserve their identity and liberty, to remain the Netherlands, Britain, France, Germany. Everywhere, patriots are on the march. We are living the Patriot Spring.

Everywhere, democratic revolutions are underway. They will drive the elites from power. People are sick and tired of seeing their nations lose. They are fed up with how the political and media elites are weakening their country. They want to regain their national sovereignty from supranational organizations such as the European Union. They want to get rid of the fake parliaments that sell out the national interests because they no longer stand for what the majority of the people want. They want brave and patriot politicians in the legislatures. They also want more direct democracy, so that the people can correct those who misrepresent them.

For decades, Westerners have been told by their elites that multiculturalism was a virtue and patriotism a thing of the past. The values of the middle classes with their common sense, rooted in the traditions and morals passed down by their parents, were undermined and ridiculed by the mindless political correctness of the educational system, the government apparatus, and the mainstream media. The economic prosperity of the people was squandered by high taxes, foolish monetary experiments, and bailouts for foreign countries. “Our nation first” became “our nation last”. 

The elites applaud politicians such as German Chancellor Angela Merkel. President Obama praised her for her leadership. Time dubbed her “Chancellor of the Free World”, for one single reason. Because she has foolishly sold out the safety and wellbeing of her own people to hordes of largely male fortune seekers who rather than fight for their own country, have come to live on German taxpayers’ money.

Frau Merkel is not the only Western politician conducting policies that harm the interests of her own people. In fact, most of our Western leaders, including my own Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, are politically correct adherents of detrimental open door policies. Before the year in which Angela Merkel became “Person of the Year” was over, Germany experienced its own sexual 9/11. On New Year’s Eve in Cologne alone, over 1,000 women were assaulted, groped, raped. So far, 30 suspects have been caught. All of them North-Africans, and half of those asylum seekers. Also in other West European countries we see a rise of “sexual” assaults.

Unlike the ruling elites in politics, media, and academia, ordinary people recognize an existential threat when they see one. Years ago already, they have begun to realize that the democratic institutions in their national capitals no longer represent the will of the people. They realize that time is running out for the West, and that the moment has come for a democratic revolution to halt the folly of the elites, otherwise our superior Western civilization will perish, our nation will change beyond recognition, and our children’s future will be endangered. It is clear what millions of Europeans and Americans want. They want to protect national sovereignty, stop the tsunami of asylum seekers, close the borders to mass immigration, stop spending their taxes on foreigners, they want leaders who truly represent them and defend the national interest. They do not want their countries to be Islamized.

And that is why we should add a new chapter to the long list of historical examples of people standing up for democracy and freedom. Let us add the Patriot Spring of 2016 to the list. And let us all be part of it.

Posted under Demography, Europe, immigration, Islam, jihad, Muslims, Netherlands by Jillian Becker on Thursday, January 28, 2016

Tagged with

This post has 8 comments.

Permalink
  • Geert is a hero of mine as well. He’s held firm for over a decade.

  • Bruce

    I don’t think that this will be over until the people driving it, being the rich, billion/millionaire globalist leftists and their power-hungry heirs and fellows, are either stripped of their wealth or put to death. I have no problem with people making lots of money, but when they abuse that money to manipulate people into working against their own self-interest and deliberately spreading lies and propaganda to empower themselves, they show that they are enemies of freedom and are not responsible enough to hold that much wealth.

    • Please, Bruce, identify some of the culprits. Give us their names.

      • Bruce

        Well, one of the big players is, of course, George Soros. He has his fingers in everything from climate alarmism to funding various leftist groups such as the Open Society Institute, which in turn funds various anti-American and anti-Israel groups. Here’s a good list: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1237
        He’s probably most famous as the billionaire who broke the bank of England during a financial crisis back in 1992, raking in profits to the tune of $1bil.

        Tom Steyer is another. Steyer donates heavily to pro-climate alarmism groups and the Democrat party, and many consider Steyer himself to be the primary roadblock to the Keystone XL pipeline being built, as this would have cost Steyer plenty of cash, given the trains owned by him presently move much of the oil that would have gone through the pipe.

        Al Gore is also well-represented here. I’m sure you’re well aware of what he’s done since losing his bid for the US presidency: he’s gone all over the world touting climate change and padding his pockets with speaking fees and such. He was also, IIRC, one of the ground-floor investors in the now-defunct Chicago Climate Exchange, which was going to be for carbon credit trading what NASDAQ is for stock trading. He would have stood to make trillions had cap-and-tax gone through.

        Maurice Strong was yet another, till he kicked the bucket earlier last year. A former ranking official of the UN and wealthy leftist, Strong was a Malthusian and a believer in the rightness of global governance under the UN. He’s also long been an influential member of the Club of Rome, which also numbers Soros and Gore, amongst many others on both the left and (supposedly) right. He was also a main architect behind Agenda 21.

        The Club of Rome itself appears to me to be one of the lynchpins of this entire sad operation. It’s a European-based think-tank that embraces radical environmentalism, Malthusianism, and seems to see world-wide socialism as the cure for all ills. They’re responsible for books such as “Limits to Growth”, a book first published in 1972 (It’s also been updated about every 5 years) that predicts the earth will see a major ecological collapse within 100 years unless mankind locks itself away in tiny homes in cities, cuts almost all carbon production, and drastically reduces the world population. As of 1976, they consider this ideal number to be somewhere between 500 million and 1 billion people. That’s the most recent entry I could find.

        A good takedown of The Limits of Growth can be found here: https://reason.com/archives/2012/04/18/the-limits-to-growth-40-year-update

        Here’s a few wonderful quotes from these people:

        “The concept of national sovereignty has been an immutable, indeed sacred, principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation. It is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by individual nation states, however powerful. The global community must be assured of environmental security.” -Maurice Strong at the 1992 Earth
        Summit

        The earth has a cancer, and it’s cancer is man. – Club of Rome, “Mankind at the Turning Point”

        ‘What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? The group’s conclusion is ‘no’. The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?’—Maurice Strong, Interview 1992

        “In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.” – Another from the Club of Rome.

        • liz

          The earth has a cancer, and it’s cancer is the Club of Rome.
          These self anointed megalomaniacs, playing God and manipulating humanity like pawns on a chess board, are the real enemy.

        • Thank you, Bruce. A very precise account of these deeply evil men. The quotations from them are priceless. Worth keeping and referring to in the future. (Which I shall do of course with acknowledgment to you.) Each of them is Goldfinger. And there’s no James Bond to destroy them. The Saudi royals could be added to the list, their motivation being the advance of Islam for its own sake. These are indeed the powers that rule the darkness of this world.

          • Bruce

            There’s plenty more at http://www.green-agenda.com/index.html. Some of these kooks actually seem to think the Earth is alive and has it’s own consciousness, like real life is a reflection of Final Fantasy 7 or the like.

            Edit: Whoops, put in the wrong link. Fixed it.