Political dhimmis of the West 3

The West has learnt the word “dhimmi since Islam started to succeed (in the 1970s) with its old plan to overwhelm and rule it. A dhimmi is a non-Muslim living under Muslim rule; one who has opted to pay protection money to the overlords in exchange for being allowed to live; one who has submitted to Islam without converting to it.

Which is to say – submitted to an inferior culture, law, and ideology.

But the word could be used more widely. It could usefully be applied to the many weak intellectuals, academics, postmodernists, deconstructionists, feminists … to all who have submitted to the inferior culture, values, ideology of the Left.

They are easy to spot. Their speech is a chant. They chant mantras of the Left.

ReBecca Roloff

Here is an example, so pure it could be used as a perfect model by all “politically correct” dhimmis. It was written by ReBecca [sic] Roloff,  president of St. Catherine University, a Catholic school in St. Paul, Minnesota, to explain why an annual leadership conference was cancelled for 2018. The organizers had suddenly realized that the invited speakers – leaders in industry and commerce – were almost all white people. The Left does not approve of people being hired, appointed to leadership positions, or invited to speak at universities, because of their their merit and achievement. The Left wants people to get jobs and honors on a quota system, to be hired and appointed for – above all else – their color and race. No whites allowed – or as few as may be absolutely necessary, and those few guaranteed to be deeply ashamed of themselves for being white. Ditto if they are male, because “gender” matters next after race. Third, they should not be patriots, Christians, Israelis/Jews, and decidedly not conservatives of any race or “gender”. Fourth, they should not be middle-class  – or even persons of [proven] “ability”! 

In a time where sexism and racism, in their individual and institutional forms, are recognized and called out, those of us in positions of power and privilege – be it through whiteness, maleness, middle-class position, heterosexual-normativity, ability, or Christianity – must slow down, reflect, and listen to those who have been subject to systematic silencing, exploitation, marginalization, and exclusion.

Leftists do not look out of the same window as conservatives. Theirs opens on to a different landscape. They see different causes for political action and judge them according to a different set of values. Their discourse is conducted in different words, a vocabulary out of their own slim political lexicon. The most important word is “diversity“, which means the hiring, appointing, inviting, and listening to only non-white, non-male, non-“heteronormative”, non-middle-class persons who are all of the same political opinion. They see a mirage of President Trump “colluding” with Vladimir Putin.

They do not see what we conservatives see through our window: the need to strengthen the economy by lowering taxes and lifting regulations; to stem the flow of illegal immigrants into the US; to deport illegal aliens who are dangerous criminals; to heal the government agencies that were infected with Clintonitis under the Obama administration. They do not see the Islamic invasion of Europe, the constant threat of terrorism there and in the US by Muslims affiliated with al-Qaeda, ISIS, the Taliban, Iran, Qatar …. They are not concerned about Iran becoming a nuclear power, or North Korea dropping a nuke on Guam. They do not discuss the war in the Middle East. They refuse to notice the outcome of socialist policies imposed in Venezuela where people are now starving.

They attack the Constitution. They want to change the First Amendment so they can stop the expression of all ideas they don’t want to hear. They want to change the Second Amendment so they can stop citizens owning guns.

Institutions could be labeled dhimmis too. Most of the top universities are earning it.

Here’s James Delingpole commenting on Oxford University’s decision that from now on 40% of recommended authors on philosophy reading lists must be women. (How the heck did it arrive at that number?)

How many feminists does it take to ruin a philosophy course?

Oxford University will be letting you know shortly, once it has got the results of its latest politically correct academic experiment.

From now on, Oxford’s philosophy faculty has decreed, 40 percent of the recommended authors on its departmental reading lists must be female.

Also, academic staff have been asked to use philosophers’ first names rather than their initials when compiling reading lists, to make it clearer to undergraduates which ones are female.

This is great news for Barbara Socrates, Mandy Aristotle, Seraphina Wittgenstein, Nancy Descartes, Fifi Trixibelle Locke, Suzi Nietzsche, Bobbi Confucius, Ermintrude Plato, and Petronella Hume, to name but a few of the awesome female philosophical intellects who have been cruelly neglected by history because sexism, misogyny, and the oppressive phallocentric hegemony. …

How then is this new gender quota going to improve standards on the philosophy course at Oxford – formerly (till it became irredeemably SJW converged) one of the world’s better universities?

Short answer: it won’t.

As with artists, composers, writers, musicians, and pretty much every creative or intellectual endeavour you can name, so it is with philosophers: the vast majority of the really great ones were men and the vast majority – for obvious reasons which need not detain us here – always will be men, regardless of how many female contenders get overpromoted thanks to the current fad for enforced gender justice.

So by encouraging students to break down their reading lists according to this ridiculous, politically correct 60:40 gender quota, all the philosophy faculty is doing is promoting dross at the expense of bullion.

Graduates of the philosophy course at Oxford will no longer plausibly be able to claim that they have been properly grounded in the canon because, inevitably, there will be gaps in their knowledge created by the time they’ve wasted on Germaine Greer when they could have been reading someone proper.

This is where Oxford is going unfortunately. And also where Cambridge is going, where Harvard, Yale, and Stanford are going, where most of our great seats of learning are going, in fact.

The twin curses of postmodernism and cultural Marxism have so corrupted academe that even the best universities now prize social justice more highly than intellectual excellence – and aren’t even embarrassed to boast about it. They actually think that gender quotas are a sign of progress.

But do they actually think?

  • Don L

    Sorry, cannot remember name to give attribution: On FOX last evening 2/19/18 …

    “The fight isn’t between left and right or poor and rich … it’s between the elites and the rest of us.”

    Are the people attending our “finest” universities actually the brightest or are they the best brown-nosers, best memorizers (given incomprehension of the material – it follows no logical path) and best test-takers (they follow orders).

    The Rhodes Scholarship is not about scholarship but about adherence to Fabian socialist dogma. Bill Clinton got one: (“The Creature from Jekyll Island : A Second Look at the Federal Reserve” by G Edward Griffin)! To be left requires a lack of conscience and an absence of the facility for rational thought … exhibit this and you to can get a HAAVAAD degree in “Would-Be-Ruler”. Not smarter … fully indoctrinated and totally immersed in the ideology – as a useful stooge for the puppet masters: the central bankers!!!

    Deceptively created and kept in place by flagrant lies and obfuscation, the FED is the generator of all political corruption and the financial engine of all socialist programs and governmental adventurism around the world. And, the Lulled, Gulled and Dulled Americans don’t know they are on the hook for every bit of the lunacy – Boomagado fails to repay it’s FED backed IMF loans … American tax payer pays it!!!!!!!!!!!

    Lefties cannot see they follow an irrefutably failed ideology. They have however, succeeded in making sure most folks don’t even want to know about economics … the only thing that will save them: knowledge about their money. Americans have to be brought to ask how they have been made TO NOT CARE about their own best interests. END THE FED

  • liz

    The gulf between left and right is so wide now, we may as well be on different planets. Or rather, leftists are on their own “special” planet, in far off outer space, light years ahead (in their own minds) of us earthlings.
    When the reality is simply that, as you say, their weak minds have submitted to an inferior ideology – one that, like religion, saves them from having to think, while also convincing them of their own moral and intellectual superiority.
    I’d like to see that reading list – it wouldn’t surprise me if Ayn Rand isn’t on it.
    She’s only one of the greatest philosophers (male or female) in history, but her philosophy might open a slight gaping crevasse in the path to indoctrination.

  • That line, “the same political opinion,” is key. It’s important to note that the “diversity” they celebrate is only that of what sexual organs a person carries (or identifies as) and the melanin content of their skin.

    Intellectual diversity is not only not sought, it is not to be tolerated; indeed, it must be suppressed at all hazard.