That  ‘horrible primate’ Bill Clinton (to quote Christopher Hitchens’s description of him) says that Obama will have to ‘kiss my ass’ if he wants his support.

Read about it in this article published by a British newspaper – it may not appear in an American one.

Access seems to be blocked. Find the article in The Daily Telegraph
today, Saturday June 28 2008.

Read here how the Muslim Brotherhood has been welcomed into the government of Scotland, and given power of decision in the matter of Britain’s nuclear defenses.

Read this article about sharia-compliant financial deals and why they are a bad idea.

 ‘Islam is nothing but one man’s insanity,’ says this author, Ali Sina. It cannot be reformed, so ‘destroy it.’ 

Muhammad was ‘a narcissist, a misogynist, a pedophile, a lecher, a torturer, a mass murderer, a cult leader, an assassin, a terrorist, a mad man and a looter,’ he says, and he offers $50,000 to anyone who can prove him wrong.

 The founder of ‘Code Pink’, which vilifies the US and undermines the war effort, has an official page on Obama’s website.

‘She sees her savior in Barack Obama.’

Read about it here. 

 … the US Navy must give up its training exercises. 

This story would be hard to believe if we were not already aware of the degree of idiocy some judges are capable of. 

 Read here what the Koran and the hadith prescribe for the position and treatment of women and little girls.  

Women are slaves in Islam. They can be, and are, brutally treated and have no remedies.   

 Read to the end of this report on the freeing from prison of Abu Qatada, ‘Bin Laden’s right-hand man in Europe’, by a British court, to discover how much it is costing the British  tax-payer to keep and protect this dangerous man.

Scroll down to about one third the length of the page to find the article. 

 This great event has just been reported by Little Green Footballs.

In an experiment that has been underway for 20 years at Michigan State University, biologist Richard Lenski has actually observed evolution at work in E. Coli bacteria.

A major evolutionary innovation has unfurled right in front of researchers’ eyes. It’s the first time evolution has been caught in the act of making such a rare and complex new trait.

And because the species in question is a bacterium, scientists have been able to replay history to show how this evolutionary novelty grew from the accumulation of unpredictable, chance events.

Twenty years ago, evolutionary biologist Richard Lenski of Michigan State University in East Lansing, US, took a single Escherichia coli bacterium and used its descendants to found 12 laboratory populations. The 12 have been growing ever since, gradually accumulating mutations and evolving for more than 44,000 generations, while Lenski watches what happens.

Mostly, the patterns Lenski saw were similar in each separate population. All 12 evolved larger cells, for example, as well as faster growth rates on the glucose they were fed, and lower peak population densities.

But sometime around the 31,500th generation, something dramatic happened in just one of the populations – the bacteria suddenly acquired the ability to metabolise citrate, a second nutrient in their culture medium that E. coli normally cannot use.

Indeed, the inability to use citrate is one of the traits by which bacteriologists distinguish E. coli from other species. The citrate-using mutants increased in population size and diversity.

“It’s the most profound change we have seen during the experiment. This was clearly something quite different for them, and it’s outside what was normally considered the bounds of E. coli as a species, which makes it especially interesting,” says Lenski.

 The President appoints the people he works with, who may be very bad for the country, but the President himself is not to be held responsible for any harm they do?

So thinks Bill Steigerwald, interviewed in Townhall:

Q: If he [Barack Obama] became president, would you lose any sleep at night?

A: I wouldn’t over him. I would worry about the people he would surround himself with. I have a very high opinion of him in most respects. I don’t think he’d do anything consciously to put the country in peril. But I would worry about who his secretary of state was, I’d worry about who his secretary of interior was, I’d worry that he’d be hostile to private enterprise and the appointments he’d make. But he himself doesn’t really bother me at all. 

An outstanding example of stupidity!